Judge James Donato on Wednesday spoke about dismantling the monopoly of Alphabet Inc’s (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Google’s Android app store in the ongoing Epic v. Google case.
What Happened: Following a federal jury’s unanimous ruling eight months ago that Google’s Android store is an illegal monopoly in the Epic v. Google case, Judge Donato made his intentions clear during the final hearing on remedies, reported The Verge.
Don’t Miss:
While Google argued that opening its store to rival stores would be too much work or cost too much, Donato has dismissed these claims. “We’re going to tear the barriers down, it’s just the way it’s going to happen,” he stated.
Adding, “The world that exists today is the product of monopolistic conduct. That world is changing.” Donato will issue his final ruling in a little over two weeks.
See Also: During market downturns, investors are learning that unlike equities, these high-yield real estate notes that pay 7.5% – 9% are protected by resilient assets, buffering against losses.
While Epic won the jury trial last December, the judge has been deciding on how to rectify the damage caused by Google’s monopoly.
Epic has proposed that Google should be forced to allow rival stores to exist within its own Google Play Store and give them access to every Google Play app.
Both parties agreed that opening up the Play Store is feasible, but disagreed on the timeline, cost, and whether Google should be able to review every app in every rival store before allowing them into Google Play.
Trending: Amid the ongoing EV revolution, previously overlooked low-income communities now harbor a huge investment opportunity at just $500.
Donato plans to ban any discriminatory behavior by Google towards rival app stores, including human reviews.
He also proposed the creation of a “technical compliance and monitoring committee” to oversee the technical details and report back to the court every 90 days.
Why It Matters: In an interview, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeny compared his company’s legal battles with Google and Apple.
At the time he stated, “I would say Apple was ice and Google was fire,” adding that Apple’s “antitrust trickery” was contained within the company, while Google’s practices were more outward.
Sweney had also earlier stated that the trial validated his suspicions regarding Google’s behind-the-scenes practices. “It was really, really interesting to see that my understandings of what Google was doing behind the scenes were actually true.”
Read Next:
“ACTIVE INVESTORS’ SECRET WEAPON” Supercharge Your Stock Market Game with the #1 “news & everything else” trading tool: Benzinga Pro – Click here to start Your 14-Day Trial Now!
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
This article Google Says Opening Up Its App Store Is Expensive And Too Much Work, Gets Told By Judge, ‘We’re Going To Tear The Barriers Down’ originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.