Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Exploring governance challenges of sustainable infrastructure development on the nexus between energy and mobility – npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport

Must read

  • Rohracher, H. & Köhler, H. Households as infrastructure junctions in urban sustainability transitions: the case of hot water metering. Urban Stud. 56, 2372–2386 (2019).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bolton, R., Foxon, T. J. & Hall, S. Energy transitions and uncertainty: Creating low carbon investment opportunities in the UK electricity sector. Environ. Plann. C. Gov. Policy 34, 1387–1403 (2015).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J. & Kempton, W. The Future Promise of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Integration: A Sociotechnical Review and Research Agenda. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 42, 377–406 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gilbert, M. R., Eakin, H. & McPhearson, T. The role of infrastructure in societal transformations. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 57, 101207 (2022).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lieberherr, E., Hüesker, F. & Pakizer, K. in Routledge Handbook of Urban Water Governance 272–283 (Taylor and Francis, 2022).

  • Ferrari, M. Reflexive governance for infrastructure resilience and sustainability. Sustainability (Switz.) 12, 1–8 (2020).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Monstadt, J., Colen Ladeia Torrens, J., Jain, M., Macrorie, R. M. & Smith, S. R. Rethinking the governance of urban infrastructural transformations: a synthesis of emerging approaches. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 55, 101157 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Markolf, S. A., Helmrich, A., Kim, Y., Hoff, R. & Chester, M. Balancing efficiency and resilience objectives in pursuit of sustainable infrastructure transformations. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 56, 101181 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weijnen, M. & Correljé, A. in Shaping an Inclusive Energy Transition (eds Margot P. C. Weijnen, Zofia Lukszo, & Samira Farahani) 15–54 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).

  • van Twist, M. & Veeneman, W. W. Marktwerking op weg: over concurrentiebevordering in infrastructuurgebonden sectoren. (LEMMA BV, 1999).

  • Kunneke, R., Ménard, C. & Groenewegen, J. Network Infrastructures: Technology meets Institutions. (Cambridge University Press, 2021).

  • Whyte, J. et al. A research agenda on systems approaches to infrastructure. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 37, 214–233 (2020).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grafius, Darren, Varga, R. & Jude, L. S. Infrastructure Interdependencies: Opportunities from Complexity. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26, 04020036 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ersoy, A. Smart cities as a mechanism towards a broader understanding of infrastructure interdependencies. Regional Stud. Regional Sci. 4, 26–31 (2017).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White, S., Sperling, J. & Juran, I. in International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017. (eds L. Soibelman & F. Pena-Mora) 359–376 (American Society of Civil Engineers).

  • Roe, E. & Schulman, P. Reliability and Risk: The Challenge of Managing Interconnected Infrastructures. (Stanford University Press, 2016).

  • Gürsan, C., de Gooyert, V., de Bruijne, M. & Rouwette, E. Socio-technical infrastructure interdependencies and their implications for urban sustainability; recent insights from the Netherlands. Cities 140, 104397 (2023).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chartier, G. in Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2013. (eds C. J. Katsanis & C. Bedard) 338–342 (Canadian Society for Civil Engineering).

  • Sayarshad, H. R. Optimization of electric charging infrastructure: integrated model for routing and charging coordination with power-aware operations. npj Sustain. Mobil. Transp. 1, 4 (2024).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bolton, R. & Foxon, T. J. Infrastructure transformation as a socio-technical process — Implications for the governance of energy distribution networks in the UK. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 538–550 (2015).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coenen, J., Glass, L. M. & Sanderink, L. Two degrees and the SDGs: a network analysis of the interlinkages between transnational climate actions and the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Sci. 17, 1489–1510 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thacker, S. et al. Infrastructure for sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 2, 324–331 (2019).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wagner, B., de Gooyert, V. & Veeneman, W. Sustainable development goals as accountability mechanism? A case study of Dutch infrastructure agencies. J. Responsible Technol. 14, 100058 (2023).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Truffer, B., Störmer, E., Maurer, M. & Ruef, A. Local strategic planning processes and sustainability transitions in infrastructure sectors. Environ. Policy Gov. 20, 258–269 (2010).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hussain, M., Lin, Y. & Wang, Y. Measures to achieve carbon neutrality: What is the role of energy structure, infrastructure, and financial inclusion. J. Environ. Manage. 325 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116457 (2023).

  • Luttmer, C., Van den Akker, M. & Oosterveer, H. Een goed begin is het halve werk: Een onderzoek naar participatie bij infrastructurele rijksprojecten. (Nationale ombudsman, 2019).

  • De Bruijn, H., Ten Heuvelhof, E. & In ‘t Veld, R. Process Management: Why Project Management Fails in Complex Decision Making Processes. (Springer, 2010).

  • Chisholm, D. Coordination Without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems. (University of California Press, 1992).

  • Provan, K. G. & Kenis, P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18, 229–252 (2008).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Isett, K. R., Mergel, I. A., LeRoux, K., Mischen, P. A. & Rethemeyer, R. K. Networks in public administration scholarship: understanding where we are and where we need to go. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 21, i157–i173 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Powell, W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behav. 12, 295–336 (1990).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kenis, P. in Handbook on Theories of Governance (eds Ansell. C and Torfing. J) 149–157 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016).

  • Koppenjan, J. F. M. & Klijn, E.-H. Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making. (Psychology Press, 2004).

  • De Bruijn, H. & Ten Heuvelhof, E. Management in networks. second edition edn, (Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group., 2018).

  • Klijn, E. H. & Koppenjan, J. Complexity in Governance Network Theory. Complex., Gov. Netw. 1, 61 (2014).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Galaskiewicz, J. Interorganizational Relations. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 11, 281–304 (1985).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bevir, M. Governance: A very short introduction. (Oxford University Press, 2012).

  • Wang, H. & Ran, B. Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Manag. Rev. 25, 1187–1211 (2023).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ebers, M. Explaining Inter-Organizational Network Formation. (1997).

  • Kenis, P. & Provan, K. G. Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Adm. 87, 440–456 (2009).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klijn, E. h. Designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management. Eur. Political Sci. 4, 328–339 (2005).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yigzaw, G. S. in Examining the Socio-Technical Impact of Smart Cities (eds Fenio Annansingh) 1-35 (IGI Global, 2021).

  • Berardo, R., Fischer, M. & Hamilton, M. Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Network-Based Research. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 50, 898–913 (2020).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ansell, C. & Gash, A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18, 543–571 (2008).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ulibarri, N. et al. How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison. Policy Soc. 39, 617–637 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T. & Balogh, S. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 22, 1–29 (2012).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. & Stone, M. M. Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging. Public Adm. Rev. 75, 647–663 (2015).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lahat, L. & Sher-Hadar, N. A threefold perspective: conditions for collaborative governance. J. Manag. Gov. 24, 117–134 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hertting, N. in Theories of Democratic Network Governance (eds Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing) 43-60 (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007).

  • Teisman, G. R. Complexe besluitvorming: een pluricentrisch perspectief op besluitvorming over ruimtelijke investeringen. (Elsevier, 1992).

  • Lavrijssen, S. & Stolle, L. De juridische randvoorwaarden voor de creatie van een E-OV-Hub. (Tilburg University, 2021).

  • Bayer, M. in NGinfra Magazine Vol. 11 (ELBA\REC, Amersfoort, 2022).

  • Van Vliet, S. Pionier RET bestrijdt stroomtekort met metronet: ‘Groot landsbelang’. https://www.mobiliteit.nl/ov/2023/04/06/pionier-ret-bestrijdt-stroomtekort-met-metronet-groot-landsbelang/> (2023).

  • Wever, V. Langste stedelijk verlengsnoer van R’dam. https://www.ovmagazine.nl/nieuws/langste-stedelijk-verlengsnoer-van-rdam> (2018).

  • Puylaert, G. ‘Het is zonde al die stroom weg te gooien’. https://www.ovmagazine.nl/vakartikel/het-is-zonde-al-die-stroom-weg-te-gooien> (2020).

  • R. E. T. (Rotterdam, 2019).

  • Pennings, R. De stap naar E-hubs. https://www.railforum.nl/programma/congres-pdovs-e-hubs-voor-duurzame-ov-knooppunten> (2021).

  • RET en Stevin versnellenenergietransitie samen. https://www.ovmagazine.nl/vakartikel/ret-en-stevin-versnellen-energietransitie-samen> (2021).

  • Puylaert, G. RET wil overtollige stroom kunnen delen. https://www.ovmagazine.nl/nieuws/ret-wil-overtollige-stroom-kunnen-delen> (2021).

  • Vliegenthart, L. Rotterdamse praktijkervaring. https://www.railforum.nl/programma/congres-pdovs-e-hubs-voor-duurzame-ov-knooppunten> (2021).

  • Positief Geladen: Strategie Laadinfrastructuur 2021 2030 Rotterdam. (Municipality of Rotterdam, 2021).

  • Groen licht voor RET als elektriciteitshub voor bussen enauto’s. https://stadszaken.nl/artikel/3758/groen-licht-voor-ret-als-elektriciteitshub-voor-bussen-en-auto-s> (2021).

  • Kamerling, W. & Lavrijssen, S. E-OV Hub Kralingse Zoom: Haalbaarheidstudie inzet restcapaciteit van de metro voor laadinfrastructuur. https://futureofcharging.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Toepassing-van-restcapaciteit-van-het-metronet-voor-laadoplossingen-door-Saskia-Lavrijssen-Universiteit-Tilburg-en-Willard-Kamerling-HTA-Rail.pdf> (2021).

  • Stroom metro en tram als voeding voor voertuigen stadslogistiek. https://www.nginfra.nl/nieuws/rotterdamse-ov-e-hub-testcase/> (2022).

  • ACM. Definitief besluit Rotterdamse Electrische Tram N.V Elektriciteit. (ACM, Netherlands, 2024).

  • RET dient langverwachte aanvraag in om stroom te leveren via ‘langste verlengsnoer van Rotterdam’. https://www.spoorpro.nl/lightrail/2023/07/28/ret-dient-langverwachte-aanvraag-in-om-stroom-te-leveren-via-langste-verlengsnoer-van-rotterdam/> (2023).

  • ACM. Ontwerp codebesluit prioriteringsruimtetransportverzoeken. https://www.acm.nl/nl/publicaties/ontwerp-codebesluit-prioriteringsruimte-transportverzoeken> (2023).

  • Voorhorst, B. Landelijk Actieprogramma Netcongestie. (2022).

  • Van Vliet, S. Kamervragen over zoektocht RET om metronet te koppelen aanlaadpleinen. https://www.mobiliteit.nl/ov/2023/04/12/kamervragen-over-zoektocht-ret-om-metronet-te-koppelen-aan-laadpleinen/> (2023).

  • Jetten, R. A. A. Antwoorden op Kamervragen over de wettelijke belemmeringen voor het koppelen van bovenleidingen aan laadpunten voor elektrisch vervoer, https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2023/03/08/beantwoording-vragen-over-de-wettelijke-belemmeringen-voor-het-koppelen-van-bovenleidingen-aan-laadpunten-voor-elektrisch-vervoer> (2023).

  • Jetten, R. A. A. Antwoorden op vragen over de knelpunten voor het koppelen van bovenleidingen aan laadpunten voor elektrisch vervoer, https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2023/10/24/beantwoording-vragen-over-de-knelpunten-voor-het-koppelen-van-bovenleidingen-aan-laadpunten-voor-elektrisch-vervoer> (2023).

  • Mastenbroek, T. ACM: met flexibel gebruik meer mogelijk op vol stroomnet, voorrang voor maatschappelijke projecten. https://www.acm.nl/nl/publicaties/acm-met-flexibel-gebruik-meer-mogelijk-op-vol-stroomnet-voorrang-voor-maatschappelijke-projecten> (2024).

  • Hadden, B. RETteketet naar een beter net: Rotterdamse trams gaan congestie verlichten. https://www.solar365.nl/nieuws/retteketet-naar-een-beter-net-rotterdamse-trams-gaan-congestie-verlichten-65adb1af.html> (2024).

  • Consultancy.org. ‘Gebruik onbenut ov-elektriciteitsnet voor verlichten van netcongestie. https://www.consultancy.nl/nieuws/53127/gebruik-onbenut-ov-elektriciteitsnet-voor-verlichten-van-netcongestie> (2024).

  • Vestergaard, R. Rotterdam vindt stroom voor laadpalen op ov-netwerk. https://fd.nl/tech-en-innovatie/1523081/rotterdam-vindt-benodigde-stroomvoor-laadpalen-op-ov-netwerk> (2024).

  • NGinfra. Verder kijken dan je eigen stoeptegel. https://www.nginfra.nl/nieuws/verslag-congres-infratrends-2022/> (2022).

  • OV-Magazine. Ov-sector kan het verschil maken. https://www.ovmagazine.nl/artikel/ov-sector-kan-het-verschil-maken> (2024).

  • De Ronde, K. Stroombehoefte OV groeit en dat biedt kansen om stroomnet te ontlasten. https://energeia.nl/stroombehoefte-ov-groeit-en-dat-biedt-kansen-om-stroomnet-te-ontlasten/> (2024).

  • Spijksma, G. Bijdrage O. V. aan het verlichten van netcongestie. (OV-NL, The Hague, 2024).

  • Thomann, E. & Maggetti, M. Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools. Sociological Methods & Research 49, https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700 (2017).

  • Blatter, J. & Blume, T. In Search of Co-variance, Causal Mechanisms or Congruence? Towards a Plural Understanding of Case Studies. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 14, 315–356 (2008).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett, A. & Checkel, J. T. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

  • Ragin, C. C. & Becker, H. S. What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. (Cambridge University Press, 1992).

  • Hendriks, J. N. & Sturmberg, B. C. P. An integrated model of electric bus energy consumption and optimised depot charging. npj Sustain. Mobil. Transp. 1, 10 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Siciliano, M., Wang, W. & Medina, A. Mechanisms of Network Formation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 4, https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa017 (2020).

  • Provan, K. G. & Lemaire, R. H. Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice. Public Adm. Rev. 72, 638–648, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02595.x (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robertson, P. J. An Assessment of Collaborative Governance in a Network for Sustainable Tourism: The Case of RedeTuris. Int. J. Public Adm. 34, 279–290 (2011).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Krueathep, W., Riccucci, N. M. & Suwanmala, C. Why Do Agencies Work Together? The Determinants of Network Formation at the Subnational Level of Government in Thailand. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 20, 157–185 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berthod, O. & Segato, F. Developing Purpose-Oriented Networks: A Process View. Perspect. Public Manag. Gov. 2, 203–212 (2019).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Raab, J., Mannak, R. S. & Cambré, B. Combining Structure, Governance, and Context: A Configurational Approach to Network Effectiveness. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 25, 479–511, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut039 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Provan, K. G. & Milward, H. B. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm. Rev. 61, 414–423 (2001).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gailing, L. & Röhring, A. Is it all about collaborative governance? Alternative ways of understanding the success of energy regions. Util. Policy 41, 237–245 (2016).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F. & Nasi, G. Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Adm. 88, 528–550 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Imperial, M. T., Johnston, E., Pruett-Jones, M., Leong, K. & Thomsen, J. Sustaining the useful life of network governance: life cycles and developmental challenges. Front. Ecol. Envir. 14, 135–144 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Emerson, K. & Nabatchi, T. Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: a performance matrix. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 38, 717–747 (2015).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carboni, J. L., Saz-Carranza, A., Raab, J. & Isett, K. R. Taking dimensions of purpose-oriented networks seriously. Perspect. Public Manag. Gov. 2, 187–201 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nowell, B. L. et al. Studying networks in complex problem domains: advancing methods in boundary specification. Perspect. Public Manag. Gov. 1, 273–282 (2018).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cloutier, C. & Langley, A. What Makes a Process Theoretical Contribution? Organization Theory 1 (2020).

  • Blatter, J. & Haverland, M. Designing case studies explanatory approaches in small-n research. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).

  • Beach, D. & Pedersen, R. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. (University of Michigan Press, 2013).

  • Ulibarri, N. Tracing process to performance of collaborative governance: a comparative case study of federal hydropower licensing. Policy Stud. J. 43, 283–308 (2015).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beach, D. It’s all about mechanisms – what process-tracing case studies should be tracing. N. Polit. Econ. 21, 463–472 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Falleti, T. G. & Lynch, J. F. Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comp. Political Stud. 42, 1143–1166 (2009).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goertz, G. Contexts of International Politics. (Cambridge University Press, 1994).

  • Latest article